Local and Subnational Governments Coalition to End Plastic Pollution

I. Background of the creation of the Coalition

The Local and Subnational Governments Coalition to End Plastic Pollution brings together local and subnational authorities committed to tackling one of today’s most urgent environmental and health challenges. The Coalition advocates for ambitious, locally driven action and calls for LSNGs to be recognized as key partners in addressing the full life cycle of plastics.

Rooted in circular economy and environmental justice principles, the Coalition unites local and subnational governments, networks, and partners working toward a world free from plastic pollution. Through collaboration, advocacy, and shared knowledge, it amplifies local and subnational voices in global decision-making.

 

The challenge: A global crisis with local consequences

Plastic pollution has reached alarming levels, threatening ecosystems, economies, and health. Without decisive action, plastic waste entering aquatic ecosystems could nearly triple, approximately 14 million tonnes per year in 2016 to up to 37 million tonnes by 2040.

Local and subnational governments are on the front line. Urban centers face rising waste volumes, clogged drains, and higher cleaning costs, while mismanaged plastic waste fuels pollution and health risks. Yet, these governments bear responsibility for managing waste infrastructure without controlling upstream production and consumption. Addressing this requires a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach, ensuring that cities and regions are central to the solution.

II. The Coalition’s vision and role

Advocacy and action. The Coalition envisions a world where plastic pollution is eliminated through systemic change, circular solutions, and inclusive governance. Its mission is to ensure that local and subnational governments are recognized and empowered as key actors in transforming plastic systems—from design to disposal.

 

Local and subnational governments contribute by:

 

  • Understanding local realities – Implementation happens where they operate.
  • Regulating and operating – Managing waste systems and enforcing local measures.
  • Innovating and scaling – Piloting and replicating effective solutions.
  • Engaging stakeholders – Connecting science, policy, and communities.
  • Ensuring inclusion – Supporting a just transition for workers and residents.

III. Participation in multilateral diplomacy and processes

2.1. The process of negotiation of a Global Plastic Treaty : Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment.

 

At the 2022 United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA-5.2), Member States of the United Nations adopted a land-mark Resolution, 5/14, to develop a legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution.

 

The negotiations began shortly thereafter and are still continuing under the nomination of Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC)

Although this process of negotiation is exclusively Member States driven, the Coalition actively contributed throughout the negotiation process, advocating for local and subnational governments’ role in shaping and implementing the treaty: 

 

  • Recognition of the role of local and subnational governments’ role through inclusion of appropriate language in the various drafts of the treaty.
  • Full life cycle accountability, focusing on upstream measures.
  • Inclusion of these governments in national implementation, capacity building, and potential finance mechanisms to be created.

The Coalition’s work ensured that local and subnational perspectives are now firmly embedded in global plastic governance discussions so far and will continue its work until the end of the interstate negotiation and the adoption of the final text of the treaty.

IV. Join the coalition in general and be listed as a supporter

  • Coalition Signatories

    Join the coalition and provide your consent to be quoted as a signatory to any statement the coalition develops during the negotiation process.

    We currently have 111 signatories:

    1.             ACR+ (Association of Cities and Regions for sustainable Resource management)
    2.             Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    3.             Asociación de ciudades capitales (ACC)
    4.             Asociacion Dominicana de Muicipios del Este
    5.             Asociación Nacional de Autoridades Ambientales Estatal (ANAAE)
    6.             Associación de residuos Latinoamericana, Mexico
    7.             Associación Mexicana de Oficinas de Asuntos Internacionales de los Estados (AMAIE)
    8.             AVF Germany
    9.             Baden-Württemberg, Germany
    10.             State of Baja California, Mexico
    11.             Blaine County, Idaho, United States
    12.             British-Colombia, Canada
    13.             Câmara Municipal de Guimarães, Portugal
    14.             State of Campeche, Mexico
    15.             Cantón de Buenos Aires, Costa Rica
    16.             Cantón de El Guarco, Costa Rica
    17.             Cantón de Flores, Costa Rica
    18.             Cantón de Jiménez, Costa Rica
    19.             Cantón de La Unión, Costa Rica
    20.             Cantón de Oreamuno, Costa Rica
    21.             Cantón de Paquera, Costa Rica
    22.             Cantón de Puriscal, Costa Rica
    23.             Cantón de San José, Costa Rica
    24.             Cantón de Tibás
    25.             Cantón de Tilarán, Costa Rica,
    26.             Cape Coast, Ghana
    27.             Center for Leadership, Communication and Governance, Inc. (CLCGI)Quezon City, Philippines
    28.             Centre of Excellence in Disaster Management
    29.             Chefchaouen, Morocco
    30.             State of Chiapas, Mexico
    31.             State of Chihuaua, Mexico
    32.             Circe.med
    33.             City Government of Mati, Philippines
    34.             City of Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
    35.             City of Boulder, United States
    36.             City of Lansing, United States
    37.             City of Luleå, Sweden
    38.             City of Malaybalay, CDRRM office
    39.             City of Marseille, France
    40.             City of Matosinhos, Portugal
    41.             City of Medellín, Colombia
    42.             City of Montréal, Canada
    43.             City of Portland, City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, United States
    44.             City of Santa Rosa, United States
    45.             City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa
    46.             City of Washington, United States
    47.             City of West Hollywood, United States
    48.             State of Colima, Mexico
    49.             Communauté des Communes du Plateau, Benin
    50.             Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions (CPMR)
    51.             County of Ventura, United States
    52.             Distrito Central Honduras, Honduras
    53.             Distrito Especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Medellín, Colombia
    54.             Earth Development Foundation
    55.             State of Mexico, Mexico
    56.             Estado de Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    57.             European Committee of the Regions (CdR)
    58.             Fortaleza, Brazil
    59.             Goicoechea, Costa Rica
    60.             Government of Catalonia
    61.             Government of Quebec
    62.             Goyang Special City, Republic of Korea
    63.             State of Guanajuato, Mexico
    64.             State of Guerrero, Mexico
    65.             Indian plastics institute
    66.             Integrated Development Africa Programme
    67.             Interfacing Development Interventions for Sustainability (IDIS), Inc.
    68.             Jackson, Wyoming, United States
    69.             State of Jalisco, Mexico
    70.             Kampala City, Uganda, Walton Africa
    71.             Key West, United States
    72.             Kochi, Kerala, India
    73.             La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
    74.             Lagos city, Nigeria
    75.             Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran
    76.             Miami-Dade County Office of Resilience, United States
    77.             Mississippi River Cities & Towns Initiative (MRCTI)
    78.             State of Michoacan, Mexico
    79.             State of Morelos, Mexico
    80.             Municipality of Walvis Bay, Namibia
    81.             Mykolaiv City Council, Ukraine
    82.             Nansana, Uganda
    83.             Navas de San Juan, Spain
    84.             State of Nuevo León, Mexico
    85.             Ocean Cities Network
    86.             Odun State, Nigeria
    87.             Provincia de Córdoba, Argentina
    88.             Provincia de Imbambura, Ecuador
    89.             Provincia de Jujuy, Argentina
    90.             Renca, Chile
    91.             Salvador City Hall, Bahia, Brazil
    92.             State of San Luis Potosí, Mexico
    93.             SEMADET, Mexico
    94.             Secrétaire général adjoint ONG ASP-AL-HERI
    95.             Seongnam City, Republic of Korea
    96.             Silver Spring, United States
    97.             State of Sonora, Mexico
    98.             State of Tamaulipas, Mexico
    99.             Tigray Development Association
    100.             Town of Mountain Village, United States
    101.             Tunapuna Piarco Regional Corporation, Trinidad and Tobago
    102.             Turku, Finland
    103.             Unión Nacional de Gobiernos Locales de Costa Rica (UNGLC)
    104.             Valle del Cauca, Colombia
    105.             Village of Park Forest, United States
    106.             Zaria Metropolitan Development Authority, Nigeria
    107.             Zoueratte, Mauritania
    108.             Zumbi Zamora Chinchipe, Ecuador
    109.             Arraial do Cabo RJ
    110.             Montpellier Méditterranée Métropole
    111.            Ville de Marseille

    NB : Any of the above does not imply legal, financial or any other type of implications. It simply shows support and adherence to the Coalition’s vision and role as described and could be un-suscribed at any moment.

VI. Coordinating partners

Convening partners:

Founding LSNG Signatories:

  

In collaboration with:

Updates