Local and Subnational Governments Coalition to End Plastic Pollution

Overview

Sign up to support the Coalition and the Statement Inscríbase para apoyar a la coalición y la declaración Signez pour soutenir la coalition et la déclaration

 

In February 2022, at the resumed fifth session of the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA-5.2), a historic resolution (resolution 5/14) was adopted to develop an international legally binding instrument to contain plastic pollution, including in the marine environment with the ambition to complete the negotiations by end of 2024.

The instrument is to be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastic. The INC will consider how to promote sustainable production and consumption of plastics from product design to environmentally sound waste management through resource efficiency and circular economy approaches.

The rapidly increasing levels of plastic pollution represent a serious global environmental issue that negatively impacts the environmental, social, economic and health dimensions of sustainable development. Under a business-as-usual scenario and in the absence of necessary interventions, the amount of plastic waste entering aquatic ecosystems could nearly triple from some 9–14 million tonnes per year in 2016 to a projected 23–37 million tons per year by 2040.

Read the Coalition position towards INC- 5.2 Suggested language Read the Media Release Open letter to the INC Chair

Local and Subnational Governments Coalition to End Plastic Pollution

  • Coalition Concept

    To establish an international coalition of Local and Subnational Governments (LSNG), and relevant organizations, with the collective goal of engaging Member States and the INC-Secretariat during and post INC negotiations with a unified voice. The coalition also seeks to ensure that the future international instrument on plastic pollution has a high ambition to address plastic pollution, and also create healthy and thriving communities and workforce in line with the principles of a Just Transition, while ensuring a sustainable economy. You can find more information about the coalition here.

  • Coalition position towards INC - 5.2

    The Coalition’s position, developed specifically for INC-5.2, outlines the reasons for including the voices of local and subnational governments in the final instrument. The statement also highlights key areas that affect these governments while advocating for a robust final document. You can find more information about the coalition here.

  • Coalition Statement

    The Coalition Statement, that is developed specifically for INC-4, sets out the rationale for local and subnational governments voice to be included in the final instrument. The Statement also identifies critical areas that impacts local and subnational governments, while advocating for an ambitious final instrument. The coalition can be found here.

    Versión en Español Version française

     

  • Coalition Signatories

    We currently have 108 signatories:

    1. ACR+ (Association of Cities and Regions for sustainable Resource management)
    2. Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    3. Asociación de ciudades capitales (ACC)
    4. Asociacion Dominicana de Muicipios del Este
    5. Asociación Nacional de Autoridades Ambientales Estatal (ANAAE)
    6. Associación de residuos Latinoamericana, Mexico
    7. Associación Mexicana de Oficinas de Asuntos Internacionales de los Estados (AMAIE)
    8. AVF Germany
    9. Baden-Württemberg, Germany
    10. State of Baja California, Mexico
    11. Blaine County, Idaho, United States
    12. British-Colombia, Canada
    13. Câmara Municipal de Guimarães, Portugal
    14. State of Campeche, Mexico
    15. Cantón de Buenos Aires, Costa Rica
    16. Cantón de El Guarco, Costa Rica
    17. Cantón de Flores, Costa Rica
    18. Cantón de Jiménez, Costa Rica
    19. Cantón de La Unión, Costa Rica
    20. Cantón de Oreamuno, Costa Rica
    21. Cantón de Paquera, Costa Rica
    22. Cantón de Puriscal, Costa Rica
    23. Cantón de San José, Costa Rica
    24. Cantón de Tibás
    25. Cantón de Tilarán, Costa Rica,
    26. Cape Coast, Ghana
    27. Center for Leadership, Communication and Governance, Inc. (CLCGI)Quezon City, Philippines
    28. Centre of Excellence in Disaster Management
    29. Chefchaouen, Moroco
    30. State of Chiapas, Mexico
    31. State of Chihuaua, Mexico
    32. Circe.med
    33. City Government of Mati, Philipines
    34. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
    35. City of Boulder, United States
    36. City of Lansing, United States
    37. City of Luleå, Sweden
    38. City of Malaybalay, CDRRM office
    39. City of Marseille, France
    40. City of Matosinhos, Portugal
    41. City of Medellín, Colombia
    42. City of Montréal, Canada
    43. City of Portland, City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, United States
    44. City of Santa Rosa, United States
    45. City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa
    46. City of Washington, United States
    47. City of West Hollywood, United States
    48. State of Colima, Mexico
    49. Communauté des Communes du Plateau, Benin
    50. Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions (CPMR)
    51. County of Ventura, United States
    52. Distrito Central Honduras, Honduras
    53. Distrito Especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Medellín, Colombia
    54. Earth Development Foundation
    55. State of Mexico, Mexico
    56. Estado de Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    57. European Committee of the Regions (CdR)
    58. Fortaleza, Brazil
    59. Goicoechea, Costa Rica
    60. Government of Catalonia
    61. Government of Quebec
    62. Goyang Special City, Republic of Korea
    63. State of Guanajuato, Mexico
    64. State of Guerrero, Mexico
    65. Indian plastics institute
    66. Integrated Development Africa Programme
    67. Interfacing Development Interventions for Sustainability (IDIS), Inc.
    68. Jackson, Wyoming, United States
    69. State of Jalisco, Mexico
    70. Kampala City, Uganda, Walton Africa
    71. Key West, United States
    72. Kochi, Kerala, India
    73. La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
    74. Lagos city, Nigeria
    75. Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran
    76. Miami-Dade County Office of Resilience, United States
    77. Mississippi River Cities & Towns Initiative (MRCTI)
    78. State of Michoacan, Mexico
    79. State of Morelos, Mexico
    80. Municipality of Walvis Bay, Namibia
    81. Mykolaiv City Council, Ukraine
    82. Nansana, Uganda
    83. Navas de San Juan, Spain
    84. State of Nuevo León, Mexico
    85. Ocean Cities Network
    86. Odun State, Nigeria
    87. Provincia de Córdoba, Argentina
    88. Provincia de Imbambura, Ecuador
    89. Provincia de Jujuy, Argentina
    90. Renca, Chile
    91. Salvador City Hall, Bahia, Brazil
    92. State of San Luis Potosí, Mexico
    93. SEMADET, Mexico
    94. Secrétaire général adjoint ONG ASP-AL-HERI
    95. Seongnam City, Republic of Korea
    96. Silver Spring, United States
    97. State of Sonora, Mexico
    98. State of Tamaulipas, Mexico
    99. Tigray Development Association
    100. Town of Mountain Village, United States
    101. Tunapuna Piarco Regional Corporation, Trinidad and Tobago
    102. Turku, Finland
    103. Unión Nacional de Gobiernos Locales de Costa Rica (UNGLC)
    104. Valle del Cauca, Colombia
    105. Village of Park Forest, United States
    106. Zaria Metropolitan Development Authority, Nigeria
    107. Zoueratte, Mauritania
    108. Zumbi Zamora Chinchipe, Ecuador

Partners

Convening partners:

Founding LSNG Signatories:

  

In collaboration with:

Contacts

ICLEI, Magash Naidoo, Head of Circular Development- World Secretariat, magashen.naidoo@iclei.org, 

Government of Quebec, Véronique-Aimée Dion, Veronique-Aimee.Dion@mri.gouv.qc.ca

Government of Catalonia, Maria Rosés Giralt, mariaroses@gencat.cat

United Cities and Local Governments, Pablo Sebastián Mariani, p.mariani@uclg.org

Global Cities Hub, Kamelia Kemileva, k.kemileva@globalcitieshub.org

Updates